Rohstoff-Welt.de - Die ganze Welt der Rohstoffe

Penn Virginia Corporation Announces Year-End 2012 Proved Reserves and Provides Operational Update

29.01.2013  |  Business Wire

Oil / NGLs Proved Reserves Increased by 28 Percent to Represent 40
Percent of Total Proved Reserves

Eagle Ford Shale Proved Reserves Increased by 161 Percent

Oil / NGLs Were 56 Percent of Production in the Fourth Quarter of 2012


Penn Virginia Corporation (NYSE: PVA) today announced proved oil and gas
reserves and provided an update of its operations, including full-year
and fourth quarter 2012 operational results.

Proved Reserves and Operational Update Highlights


Proved reserve data included the following:


Operational results for the fourth quarter of 2012, with comparisons to
the third quarter 2012 where applicable, included the following:

Fourth Quarter 2012 Operational Results

Pricing


Our preliminary fourth quarter 2012 realized oil price was $99.30 per
barrel, compared to $99.45 ?per barrel price in the third quarter of
2012. Our preliminary fourth quarter 2012 realized NGL price was $32.40
per barrel, compared to $32.94 per barrel price in the third quarter of
2012. Our preliminary fourth quarter 2012 realized natural gas price was
$3.41 per thousand cubic feet (Mcf), compared to $2.72 per Mcf price in
the third quarter of 2012. Adjusting for oil and gas hedges, our
preliminary fourth quarter 2012 effective oil price was $106.40 ?per
barrel and our effective natural gas price was $3.83 per Mcf, or
increases of $7.10 per barrel and $0.42 per Mcf over the realized prices.

Production


 ?
Total and Daily Equivalent Production for the Three Months Ended
Dec. 31,
 ?
Dec. 31,
 ?
Sept. 30,
 ?

 ?

 ?
Dec. 31,
 ?
Dec. 31,
 ?
Sept. 30,
Region / Play Type
 ?
2012
 ?
2011
 ?
20122012
 ?
2011
 ?
2012

(in MBOE)

(in BOEPD)
Texas94481690110,2658,8699,792
Cotton Valley/Other2162702162,3522,9402,345
Haynesville Shale961471041,0411,6031,130
Eagle Ford (1)6323985816,8724,3266,317
Appalachia7362107783,9331,165
Mid-Continent2663722892,8924,0443,136
Mississippi203
 ?
239
 ?
2082,209
 ?
2,602
 ?
2,256
Totals1,421
 ?
1,789
 ?
1,50415,444
 ?
19,449
 ?
16,348
Pro Forma Totals(2)1,421
 ?
1,442
 ?
1,40315,444
 ?
15,671
 ?
15,245

 ?

 ?

Total and Daily Equivalent Production for the Year Ended
December 31,

Region / Play Type
 ?
2012
 ?
2011
 ?
2010
 ?

 ?

 ?
2012
 ?
2011
 ?
2010

(in MBOE)

(in BOEPD)
Texas3,671
 ?
2,976
 ?
2,30410,029
 ?
8,152
 ?
6,311
Cotton Valley/Other8821,3671,2532,4113,7453,432
Haynesville Shale4547561,0511,2412,0732,879
Eagle Ford (1)2,334852---6,3772,335---
Appalachia7841,5111,7332,1434,1384,748
Mid-Continent1,2112,1802,5573,3095,9737,005
Mississippi847
 ?
1,092
 ?
1,2742,314
 ?
2,993
 ?
3,490
Totals6,513
 ?
7,759
 ?
7,86717,794
 ?
21,257
 ?
21,553
Pro Forma Totals(2)5,773
 ?
5,897
 ?
5,53915,776
 ?
16,157
 ?
15,176

 ?
(1)
 ?

Initial production from the Eagle Ford Shale commenced in February
2011.
(2)
Pro forma to exclude production from the Appalachian assets sold in
July 2012, Mid-Continent assets sold in August 2011 and Gulf Coast
assets sold in January 2010.

Note - Numbers may not add due to
rounding.


The production in the fourth quarter of 2012 and full-year 2012 exceeded
the upper end of our previously provided guidance. As shown in the table
above, on a pro forma basis to exclude production from assets sold in
2011 and 2012, production in the fourth quarter of 2012 was 1.4 MMBOE,
or 15,444 BOEPD, compared to 1.4 MMBOE, or 15,671 ?BOEPD, in the prior
year quarter and 1.4 MMBOE, or 15,245 BOEPD, in the third quarter of
2012. As a percentage of total equivalent production, oil and NGL
volumes were 56 ?percent in the fourth quarter of 2012, compared to 37
percent in the prior year quarter and 52 percent in the third quarter of
2012.


As shown in the table above, on a pro forma basis to exclude production
from assets sold in 2010, 2011 and 2012, production in 2012 was 5.8
MMBOE, or 15,776 BOEPD, compared to 5.9 MMBOE, or 16,157 BOEPD in 2011,
and 5.5 ?MMBOE, or 15,176 BOEPD, in 2010. The slight decrease from 2011
to 2012 was due to natural gas production declines associated with
discontinued natural gas drilling, largely offset by increased crude oil
production from the Eagle Ford Shale.

Proved Reserves


As set forth in the table below, proved reserves were 113.5 MMBOE at
year-end 2012, as compared to 130.3 MMBOE at year-end 2011, pro forma to
exclude 16.9 ?MMBOE of Appalachian reserves sold in July 2012 (reported
proved reserves at year-2011 were 147.2 ?MMBOE). The 13 percent decrease
in pro forma proved reserves was due to a 161 Bcf (26.9 ?MMBOE), or
28 ?percent, decrease in natural gas proved reserves, partially offset by
a 10.0 ?MMBOE, or 28 percent, increase in oil and natural gas liquid
(NGL) proved reserves. In the Eagle Ford Shale play, proved reserves
increased by 16.1 MMBOE, or 161 ?percent, from 10.0 MMBOE at year-end
2011 to 26.1 MMBOE at year-end 2012.


 ?
Proved Reserves at December 31, 2011(3)

 ?
Oil, NGLs and
 ?
Oil EquivalentCondensateNatural Gas
ReservesReservesReserves

 ?

 ?
(MMBOE)
 ?
(MMBbls)
 ?
(Bcf)
Proved reserves at December 31, 2011147.235.6669.9

2012 production

(6.5

)

(3.1

)

(20.3

)

2012 extensions, discoveries and other additions

18.3

16.0

13.4

2012 revisions

(28.7

)

(2.9

)

(154.4

)

2012 purchases (sales) of reserves in place, net

(16.9

)

 ?

0.0

 ?

 ?

(101.2

)
Proved reserves at December 31, 2012113.5
 ?

 ?
45.5
 ?

 ?
407.5
 ?

Percentage of equivalent reserves

100.0

%

40.1

%

59.9

%

Proved developed reserves at December 31, 2011

71.616.5330.6


Percentage of proved reserves


48.6


%


46.3

%


49.3

%

Proved developed reserves at December 31, 2012

47.018.7169.4


Percentage of proved reserves


41.4

%


41.1

%


41.6

%

Present value of future net cash flows before

income taxes ($mil.)(3)


$692.5


 ?
(3)
 ?

The estimated reserves and present value were based on pricing
assumptions for Henry Hub natural gas of $2.76 per MMBtu and West
Texas Intermediate crude oil of $94.71 per barrel. These compare to
prices of $4.12 per MMBtu and $96.19 per barrel, respectively, at
December 31, 2011. Both prices exclude the effects of hedged
production. One barrel of oil or NGLs is assumed to be equivalent to
six Mcf of natural gas. MMBbls equals millions of barrels of liquids.

Note - Numbers may not add due to
rounding.


 ?


The PV-10 value of the proved reserves at year-end 2012 was
approximately $692 million (see statement regarding non-GAAP measures
below). This PV-10 value was based on a Henry Hub (HH) price of $2.76
per million British thermal units (MMBtu) for natural gas and a West
Texas Intermediate (WTI) price of $94.71 per barrel for oil, each of
which represents the unweighted arithmetic average of the
first-day-of-the-month prices during the 12-month period ending on
December 31, 2012.


Excluding all PUD wells with negative PV-10 value, the PV-10 value for
our proved reserves was $839 million. The estimated year-end 2012 proved
reserves included proved developed reserves of 46.5 MMBOE, with a PV-10
value of $628 million, and PUD reserves of 66.5 MMBOE, with a PV-10
value of $64 million (excluding all PUD wells with negative PV-10 value,
the PV-10 value of PUD reserves was $211 million). During 2012, we added
18.3 MMBOE of proved reserves from extensions, discoveries, purchases
and other additions in the Eagle Ford Shale play.


For the 12-month period ended December 31, 2011, the average HH price
for natural gas was $4.12 per MMBtu and the average WTI price for oil
was $96.19 per barrel. As a result of the declines in natural gas and
NGL prices, together with the situation that we will not be able to
develop a portion of our PUD reserves within a five-year time period
required under the reserve rules of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC), we had 28.7 ?MMBOE of negative revisions, in the Selma
Chalk, Marcellus Shale, Haynesville Shale, Cotton Valley and Granite
Wash plays.

Operational Update

Eagle Ford Shale


Net production from the Eagle Ford Shale was 6,872 BOEPD in the fourth
quarter of 2012, compared to 6,317 BOEPD in the third quarter of 2012.
During the fourth quarter of 2012, we drilled ten (9.0 net) operated
wells in the Eagle Ford Shale, all of which were successful. Since late
October, we have completed ten (9.0 net) Eagle Ford Shale wells. This
brings the total number of on-line wells to 66 ?(55.1 ?net), with one (0.9
net) well waiting on completion, two wells being drilled in the Eagle
Ford Shale and one horizontal exploratory well being drilled in the
Pearsall Shale in Gonzales County.


As previously disclosed, we have initiated the process and are actively
seeking a 40 percent working interest partner for our Lavaca County
acreage. We expect to have this process completed late in the first
quarter. In addition, beginning in 2013, we will initiate the use of pad
drilling, which we believe will decrease costs and improve fracture
efficiency.


Set forth below are the initial results and statistics for certain Eagle
Ford Shale wells drilled and completed to date.


 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?

 ?
30-Day Average Gross
Peak Gross DailyDaily Production

Production Rates(4)

Rates(4)

LateralFracCumulative
 ?
Days OnOil
 ?
Equivalent
 ?
ChokeOil
 ?
Equivalent
Well Name
 ?
Length
 ?
StagesProduction
 ?
ProductionRate
 ?
Rate
 ?
SizeRate
 ?
Rate
FeetBOEDaysBOPDBOEPDInchesBOPDBOEPD
New Wells On-Line

Neuse #1H

4,650

19

43,080

125

633

667

13/64?

430

459

Henning #2H

3,153

13

54,094

98

920

1,002

14/64?

753

822


Smith #1H(5)


4,459

18

39,864

91

730

943

16/64?

487

629

Kusak #1H

4,453

18

39,532

70

656

779

18/64?

543

726


Leal #1H(5)


4,201

17

38,120

64

619

832

13/64?

514

725


Matias #1H(5)


4,453

20

27,502

49

899

1,013

12/64?

508

652

Miller #1H

4,502

23

17,736

46

871

931

35/64?

409

430


Freytag #1H(5)


4,952

25

20,928

33

1,071

1,195

14/64?

580

689


Kleihege #1H(5)


5,155

26

10,478

21

484

629

16/64?

400

515

Arledge Ranch #1H

4,150

21

13,666

18

1,015

1,117

16/64?

---

---


Raab #1H(5)


5,450

22

---

---

808

1,046

17/64?

---

---


Barraza #1H(5)


3,952

16

---

---

574

680

15/64?

---

---

R. Washington #1H

3,702

19

---

---

744

805

15/64?

---

---

 ?
Averages (13 newest wells)
4,402

20

27,845

56

771

895

16/64?

514

627

Averages (6 newest Gonzales wells)

4,102

19

33,622

71

807

884

19/64?

534

609

Averages (7 newest Lavaca wells)

4,660

21

23,031

44

741

905

15/64?

498

642

 ?

Averages (59 wells)(6)


4,006

17

84,057

337

882

972

16/64?

579

651


Averages (47 Gonzales wells)(6)


3,856

16

93,309

393

906

984

17/64?

589

649


Averages (12 Lavaca wells)(6)


4,594

20

47,822

120

789

926

14/64?

540

660

 ?
Other Wells


Targac #1H(5,7)


Technik #1H(5,7)


Fojtik #1H(5,7)


Cannonade Ranch #50H(8)


 ?
(4)
 ?

Wellhead rates only; the natural gas associated with these wells is
yielding approximately 145 barrels of NGLs per million cubic feet.
BOPD is defined as barrels of oil per day.
(5)
Wells located in Lavaca County; all other wells are located in
Gonzales County.
(6)
Seven wells (six in Gonzales County and one in Lavaca County) had
operational issues and/or shorter laterals and fewer frac stages. As
a result, production data for these seven wells have been excluded.
(7)
The Targac #1H well is waiting on completion. The Technik #1H and
Fojtik #1H are currently being drilled.
(8)
The Cannonade Ranch #50H well is a horizontal exploratory well
targeting the Pearsall Shale and is currently being drilled.

 ?

Derivatives Update


To support our operating cash flows, we hedge a portion of our oil and
natural gas production at pre-determined prices or price ranges. Based
on hedges currently in place, as detailed in the table below, we have
hedged approximately 4,500 ?barrels of daily crude oil production at a
weighted average floor/swap price of $97.29 per barrel and 20 million
cubic feet of daily natural gas production in 2013 at a weighted average
floor/swap price of $3.76 per Mcf. The following table summarizes our
open hedge positions through swaps and collars as of January 28, 2013.


 ?

 ?

 ?
Weighted Average

Average

Volume

Per
Day

Price per MMBtu or Barrel

Instrument Type

Floor / Swap


 ?

Ceiling

(MMBtu)
Natural Gas

First quarter 2013

Collars

10,000

$

3.50

$

4.30

Second quarter 2013

Collars

10,000

$

3.50

$

4.30

Third quarter 2013

Collars

10,000

$

3.50

$

4.30

Fourth quarter 2013

Collars

15,000

$

3.67

$

4.37

First quarter 2014

Collars

5,000

$

4.00

$

4.50

First quarter 2013

Swaps

10,000

$

4.01

Second quarter 2013

Swaps

10,000

$

4.01

Third quarter 2013

Swaps

10,000

$

4.01

Fourth quarter 2013

Swaps

5,000

$

4.04

 ?
(Barrels)
Crude Oil

First quarter 2013

Collars

1,590

$

90.00

$

99.35

Second quarter 2013

Collars

1,900

$

90.00

$

99.17

Third quarter 2013

Collars

1,900

$

90.00

$

99.17

Fourth quarter 2013

Collars

1,900

$

90.00

$

99.17

First quarter 2013

Swaps

2,250

$

103.51

Second quarter 2013

Swaps

2,250

$

103.51

Third quarter 2013

Swaps

1,500

$

102.77

Fourth quarter 2013

Swaps

1,500

$

102.77

First quarter 2014

Swaps

2,000

$

100.44

Second quarter 2014

Swaps

2,000

$

100.44

Third quarter 2014

Swaps

1,500

$

100.20

Fourth quarter 2014

Swaps

1,500

$

100.20

First quarter 2013

Swaptions

812

$

100.00

Second quarter 2013

Swaptions

812

$

100.00

Third quarter 2013

Swaptions

812

$

100.00

Fourth quarter 2013

Swaptions

812

$

100.00

 ?

Non-GAAP Measure


PV-10 value is the estimated future net cash flows from estimated proved
reserves discounted at an annual rate of ten ?percent before giving
effect to income taxes. The standardized measure is the after-tax
estimated future cash flows from estimated proved reserves discounted at
an annual rate of 10 percent, determined in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP). We use PV-10 value as one measure
of the value of our estimated proved reserves and to compare relative
values of proved reserves among exploration and production companies
without regard to income taxes. We believe that securities analysts and
rating agencies use PV-10 value in similar ways. Our management believes
PV-10 value is a useful measure for comparison of proved reserve values
among companies because, unlike standardized measure, it excludes future
income taxes that often depend principally on the characteristics of the
owner of the reserves rather than on the nature, location and quality of
the reserves themselves. We cannot reconcile PV-10 value to the
standardized measure at this time because final income tax information
for 2012 is not yet available. The standardized measure will be provided
in our forthcoming Form 10-K for the year ended December, 31 2012 to be
filed with the SEC.

Fourth Quarter and Full-Year 2012 Financial and Operational Results
Conference Call


A conference call and webcast, during which management will discuss
fourth quarter and full-year 2012 financial and operational results, is
scheduled for Thursday, February 21, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. ET. Prepared
remarks by H. Baird Whitehead, President and Chief Executive Officer,
will be followed by a question and answer period. Investors and analysts
may participate via phone by dialing 1-866-630-9986 five to 10 minutes
before the scheduled start of the conference call (use the passcode
7342669), or via webcast by logging on to our website, www.pennvirginia.com,
at least 15 minutes prior to the scheduled start of the call to download
and install any necessary audio software. A telephonic replay will be
available for two weeks beginning approximately 24 hours after the call.
The replay can be accessed by dialing toll free 888-203-1112
(international: 719-457-0820) and using the replay code 7342669. In
addition, an on-demand replay of the webcast will also be available for
two weeks at our website beginning approximately 24 hours after the
webcast.

Penn Virginia Corporation (NYSE: PVA) is an independent oil and gas
company engaged primarily in the development, exploration and production
of oil and natural gas in various domestic onshore regions, including
Texas, Oklahoma, Mississippi and Pennsylvania.
For more
information, please visit our website at
www.pennvirginia.com.


Certain statements contained herein that are not descriptions of
historical facts are 'forward-looking? statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Because such
statements include risks, uncertainties and contingencies, actual
results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such
forward-looking statements. These risks, uncertainties and contingencies
include, but are not limited to, the following: the volatility of
commodity prices for oil, NGLs and natural gas; our ability to develop,
explore for, acquire and replace oil and gas reserves and sustain
production; our ability to generate profits or achieve targeted reserves
in our development and exploratory drilling and well operations; any
impairments, write-downs or write-offs of our reserves or assets; the
projected demand for and supply of oil, NGLs and natural gas; reductions
in the borrowing base under our revolving credit facility; our ability
to contract for drilling rigs, supplies and services at reasonable
costs; our ability to obtain adequate pipeline transportation capacity
for our oil and gas production at reasonable cost and to sell the
production at, or at reasonable discounts to, market prices; the
uncertainties inherent in projecting future rates of production for our
wells and the extent to which actual production differs from estimated
proved oil and gas reserves; drilling and operating risks; our ability
to compete effectively against other independent and major oil and
natural gas companies; our ability to successfully monetize select
assets and repay our debt; leasehold terms expiring before production
can be established; environmental liabilities that are not covered by an
effective indemnity or insurance; the timing of receipt of necessary
regulatory permits; the effect of commodity and financial derivative
arrangements; our ability to maintain adequate financial liquidity and
to access adequate levels of capital on reasonable terms; the occurrence
of unusual weather or operating conditions, including force majeure
events; our ability to retain or attract senior management and key
technical employees; counterparty risk related to their ability to meet
their future obligations; changes in governmental regulations or
enforcement practices, especially with respect to environmental, health
and safety matters; uncertainties relating to general domestic and
international economic and political conditions; and other risks set
forth in our filings with the SEC.


Additional information concerning these and other factors can be found
in our press releases and public periodic filings with the SEC. Many of
the factors that will determine our future results are beyond the
ability of management to control or predict. Readers should not place
undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect management′s
views only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to revise
or update any forward-looking statements, or to make any other
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information,
future events or otherwise.


Proved reserves are those quantities of oil and gas which, by analysis
of geosciences and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable
certainty to be economically producible from a given date forward, from
known reservoirs, and under existing economic conditions, operating
methods and government regulation before the time at which contracts
providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that
renewal is reasonably certain, regardless of whether the estimate is a
deterministic estimate or probabilistic estimate. EUR is the sum of
reserves remaining as of a given date, plus cumulative production as of
that date.


Penn Virginia Corporation

James W. Dean

Vice President,
Corporate Development

610-687-7531

Fax: 610-687-3688

invest@pennvirginia.com